Curse

fog_of_redoubt · Feb 14, 2007, 09:41 PM // 21:41

1) Absolutely not

2) Absolutely not

Both make the game better. If A-Net doesn't care about the game then don't implement them. If they care about the game they should.

VitisVinifera · Feb 14, 2007, 09:43 PM // 21:43

hell no and hell no

these are things that should have been taken care of a LONG time ago and are to the detriment of this game as it currently is

Retribution X · Feb 14, 2007, 09:48 PM // 21:48

1: Yep. When they take the money from my cold dead fingers.
2: same as number one

They already have a one time fee for extra storage. it's called Character slots!

Crystal Of Winter · Feb 14, 2007, 09:52 PM // 21:52

1. No
2. No

No fees is the only thing keeping me playing atm =)
But I do agree with the person who suggested 1 time fee, as long as it's cheap :/

Makkert · Feb 14, 2007, 10:10 PM // 22:10

no. I would pay any subscription for anything. I'm a 'one time payment' type of guy

Vandal2k6 · Feb 15, 2007, 11:39 AM // 11:39

Gotta agree with you all tbh. A one time fee would be acceptable to upgrade the account (depending on how much they asked) but I too wouldn't want to pay a monthly. It's the reason I don't play most other games and I'd hate for GW to fall into that catagory.

Dione Davore · Feb 15, 2007, 02:25 PM // 14:25

1. No (enough space)
2. No (townspamming can't be prevented)

EternalTempest · Feb 15, 2007, 02:40 PM // 14:40

1) No
2) No

Also agree, would do it if it was a low cost about $5 sounds right as a one time fee.

Jetdoc · Feb 15, 2007, 02:57 PM // 14:57

1. No.
2. No.

If anyone really wants more storage, they can simply purchase another character slot at a one time cost.

Neo Nugget · Feb 15, 2007, 03:03 PM // 15:03

no aaaaaaand
no

Warmaster Patton · Feb 15, 2007, 03:13 PM // 15:13

1. Nein
2. Nein

I would never pay a subscription, one time fees aren't bad, under 10 buck. I would pay for extra storage, but not an auction house.

Gargle Blaster · Feb 15, 2007, 03:35 PM // 15:35

No and No - i refuse to pay any subscription fees.

Rodhin Kinning · Feb 15, 2007, 08:00 PM // 20:00

I would have to say no on both.

I dont like the idea on having to pay to play a game I already spent $150 on already and if I had the money to blow I would also unlock all the PvP packs and buy the GotYE so that would be another $145 give or take so that would answer that.

Navaros · Feb 15, 2007, 08:48 PM // 20:48

Nope. If I wanted to cough up money for a subscription then I'd be playing a non-instanced game for that money instead.

B Ephekt · Feb 15, 2007, 09:10 PM // 21:10

The only thing I would even consider paying a subscription for would be more attention to the pvp side of the game. Seriously, get Izzy some help and fill out some of the potential this game has. I don't care about char bags, mini pets in towns or storage space.

DOCB22 · Feb 15, 2007, 09:19 PM // 21:19

1) He11 NO!
2) He11 NO!

cthulhu reborn · Feb 15, 2007, 09:30 PM // 21:30

I feel tempted to say yes just to be different...but no...a monthly subscription is like paying the bills and I play the game partially to get away from the mundane world which revolves around...paying bills.

If it is an option you can choose to do it or not...that's why a one time fee is acceptable. We know the devs put in a lot of work so they deserve to be paid for what they do. But a lot of people like myself were looking at WoW and GW and then saw that GW had no subscription fee...that won me over and I don't regret it.

Gun Pierson · Feb 15, 2007, 09:32 PM // 21:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetdoc

If anyone really wants more storage, they can simply purchase another character slot at a one time cost.

No question about that, the question is if this is what we want, don't think so. It would be more practical to have bigger bags to store weapons and armors for one character. Kinda ridiculous I have to pick up weapons or armor parts from mule number 6.

Also the storage account should be a lot bigger. When you wanne sell a bunch of weapons now like we see here on Guru, you have to switch a zillion times when buyers come get their stuff. 'Sec man, that sword is on mule number3, oh you wanted that staff too, err make that a minute, it's on mule nr5.'

Hey Anet, this horse has been so beaten it looks like a mule by now. Enough horses and certainly enough mules. Get out that ivory storage tower and give us some quality storage.

Jetdoc · Feb 15, 2007, 09:42 PM // 21:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gun Pierson

Kinda ridiculous I have to pick up weapons or armor parts from mule number 6.

Also the storage account should be a lot bigger. When you wanne sell a bunch of weapons now like we see here on Guru, you have to switch a zillion times when buyers come get their stuff. 'Sec man, that sword is on mule number3, oh you wanted that staff too, err make that a minute, it's on mule nr5.

I absolutely agree. If you are consistently having this problem, you may want to consider creating (or purchasing) another mule and emptying your storage onto that mule. That would leave your storage open to transfer whatever items you need to use (or sell) all at one time, instead of having to switch characters several times in the middle of playing. I basically do that with all of my characters, which takes a few minutes before I start playing each day (versus completely disrupting my playing experience).

-Loki- · Feb 15, 2007, 11:09 PM // 23:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by wetsparks

Dont understand how people do have troubles, if your going to use, use it, if not sell it to someone who will.

Warrior - 4 swords, 3 axes, 3 hammers, 2 shields, 2 sets of armour, stoneskin gloves, 4 helmets.

Ranger - 8 bows, 1 hammer, 3 sets of armour.

Monk - 1 1/2 bags of weapons (staffs, wands, foci, sword, shields), 2 sets of armour, multiple headgear.

Yes, making PvP ready characters takes up a hell of a lot of space, and when you want to go do some PvE, there's not a lot of space left for drops. And this is only 3 of my characters, and not including storage or what mods and the like the characters are carrying.